So recently Jeff Borchardt published a post on his website where he attempts to demonize everyone who opposes his anti-dog tactics, and in the same group-type response in which he demonizes all Pit Bulls. What’s clear is that if you’ve ever attempted to engage Jeff and said anything that he didn’t want to hear, well, you’re basically then accused of “attacking a victim.” That’s his narrative, anyways.
That’s not to ignore or seek to justify some very reprehensible comments that he has received from others. It’s within his post that he shows you some of the cataloged screenshots. But again, people are individuals and some folks are just senseless assholes. An unavoidable fact of the matter is that there’s senseless assholes from every group of people, from every race or type of people, from every city, state and country of people. There’s no perfect fix for that, and that’s what makes people human. People are individuals, and there’s some shitty people out there from all walks of life.
But anyways, Mr. Borchardt routinely lumps valid criticism of his tactics and ideology in with ludicrous criticism and heartless commentary. This is quite obviously done so that he can avoid ever having to take accountability or have an intellectual back and forth with anyone about the actual issues, and instead just ignore all criticism across the board or use 1 person’s crappy comment to paint everyone else as insensitive or discredited. It’s a tactic, it’s obvious, and it’s lame as hell. It’s sort of like how 99% of a protest is peaceful and then you have the less than 1% that go around busting out store windows and setting fires. Then in the media the hundreds or sometimes thousands of protesters get condemned as an entire group for being “rioters” and “looters.” It’s no surprise coming from a character like Borchardt, but just pointing it out as being his mode of operation.
For instance, it was pointed out to me that he was ranting about me in the comment section of this post. I went over to both read his post and then read the comments.
It’s within Jeff’s main post where he attaches screenshots of disgraceful comments coming from (as mentioned above) senseless assholes. One person suggests that he get to “play kickball with Jeff’s son’s head.” That comment is clearly embarrassing, mental, crude and heartless. Another person tells him to “put a gun to your head and join your ugly son.” Embarrassing, mental, crude and heartless. Another person posts a photo of Jeff’s son with the caption “my dartboard.” Embarrassing, mental, crude and heartless.
Jeff uses these screenshots to typecast ALL PIT BULL-TYPE DOG OWNERS. That’s millions of people, folks. Apparently everyone is to blame for some fucking asshole making a psychopathic comment about his son! Actually, the only person to blame for whatever piece of shitty commentary that was made is the person that said it. That’s it.
Do you see a pattern with Borchardt’s world-view? He just scapegoats everyone for the actions of an individual. You disagree with him on anything regarding Pit Bulls? Well, then you’re an insensitive “nutter” who apparently rejoices in the death of his son… Complete bullshit and utter lunacy, but that is the narrative that Borchardt pushes.
Borchardt actually included a screenshot of something that I sent him on Twitter, and places it alongside some of the statements referenced above. Lovely. What did I say?
That’s not my video. No clue who ‘foamertalk’ is. Address them, not me. Also, you call that an ass-handing? That’s interesting. Clifton has ducked just as you’ve ducked for 2 months. Your online bravado does nothing for you outside of the hate group. Fire up your webcam and stop being a coward.
Mind you, this was in response to him attempting to mock me on Twitter, not the other way around. He referenced me daring to go up and engage Merritt Clifton at a conference, which I did, with my camera rolling. That video has obviously pissed a lot of people off. He said that I got my ass handed to me. Okay. Right. I then pointed out that Clifton has actually ducked getting back to me on the proposed debate that was referenced numerous times in the video. I also point out that Jeff has done the same kind of avoiding, as I proposed publicly talking to him about the issues on webcam about 6 months ago. This was suggested because Jeff most definitely has a working webcam, as he does media interviews using Skype while pushing breed-specific legislation. I then call him a coward because he constantly avoids discussing public safety issues with anyone that doesn’t either 1) give him a softball television segment or 2) totally agree with him.
Borchardt’s post then gets even more passively aggressive. In the comment section someone named Brian Adamson offers a pretty level-headed paragraph towards Jeff, which then pulls in numerous anonymous (surprise!) commenters in response, and then Jeff himself. Someone with the alias “Who Else” states that the Adamson guy is a “shill for Pit Bull breeders” who “helps dog fighters get kids and pets killed.” Um, wow. In his next comment he states that Brian Adamson is “hooked up” with me. What the heck? I am described as “that creepy guy who has Lisa Camuso telling him what to do.” Lol. I’ve never met or talked with Brian Adamson, I have no clue who he is. I’ve also never met or talked with Lisa Camuso, although I’ve seen her comment below my Merritt Clifton video. I have literally zero link with either person. I most definitely don’t have anyone telling me what to do, Lisa or otherwise. Jeff then comes on and starts shouting at me in the comments, as if I’m actually on the comment section, which I’m not. He then accuses me of posting on a Facebook page called “Truth Be Told,” which I don’t. Borchardt goes on to state that this page is where myself, Lisa Camuso and Brian Adamson go to “associate.” Jesus Christ. He then refers to us as the “Pit Bull lobby.” This is his term for anyone that has a Pit Bull-type dog or disagrees with BSL or breed bans. Again, in reality this is millions of people, folks! I’m a dog owner. I have dogs that are Pit Bull-type dogs. That’s it.
This was partially the Brian Adamson guy’s reponse to Borchardt’s claims, found further down within the comment section:
I have never had a single conversation with Josh Liddy. I mentioned him in one comment, one time and all of a sudden we are brothers in arms. That is a glaring example of how flawed your thought process is. You draw wild conclusions based on a fractional amout of evidence and research. You then present these conclusions as though they are proven, undeniable facts.
That’s actually pretty spot on.
Jeff Borchardt has no ability to actually stick to specific facts and instances. He seeks to blame everything on everyone, and link everything with everyone, and paint everything with the same brush. He fundamentally rejects the fact that people are individuals and dogs are individuals. This is a fact, he can ignore it all that he wants. When I criticize people they are being specifically criticized. I do not post for any Facebook page other than SwayLove.org. This is also my website. I write here. I do not have any aliases. I try to engage everyone. I’m 1 person who stands up for not only my dogs but tries to stand up for everyone’s dogs. My dogs have done nothing to anyone. Nothing that Jeff Borchardt has to say has anything to do with my dogs or millions of other dogs. Nothing. I am not funded by any other organization. I do not take marching orders from anyone. I’m sorry to disappoint you, Jeff. I also have a working webcam. I’ve invited you to have a public conversation, talk, debate (whatever you want to call it), as human beings. I will talk to you about anything that you want to talk about, and at any time. If you’d “school me,” as you like to say, then what exactly is the problem? Wouldn’t it be of benefit to you to publicly school me on these many issues? I am not scared of you or your information. I can stand on my own feet. You can spin things however you want to spin them, but deep down you know that’s being done to make yourself feel better and reaffirm what you already believe. Step outside of your comfort zone. Have the conversation.
Honestly, the people that scare me the most are the one’s that don’t even want to hear anyone else’s opinion unless it’s something that they already agree with. I don’t live in an echo chamber. People can say a lot of things about me, but they can’t say that. I engage, I respond, I communicate. I try to do as much of that as I can, both here and on my Facebook page. Those concepts are healthy for lifting discussions, or they should be. Bottom line.
Duck … Duck … Duck … Duck … Duck … Duck … Duck … Duck … Goose?
Inviting Borchardt to a sane and reasonable discussion is as pointless as inviting the coward who hides behind the pseudonym ‘Dawn James’ of potty-mouthed Craven Desires infamy.
As Brian so rightly asserts, the reason these people fail to enter into a fair and rational debate is that they are out of their depth and they know it.
All they have left is puff and bluster which just doesn’t pass muster.
[…] pro and anti BSL movement but as usual- Borchardt hides behind his computer continuously slinging insults and it has not gone unnoticed. He will go as far as to cancel appearances because he can’t […]
[…] trying to engage anyone with an anti-dog agenda on a platform that is out in the open and recorded, for almost a year now. Not a single DogsBite.org fanboy or fangirl has been willing to discuss any element of these […]
Dear Mr. Liddy,
Not even Colleen Lynn is “anti-dog”. She has a dog. “Dawn James”, of
Craven Desires, has a dog. I believe, more than one. Mr. Borchardt,
has a dog too. There are many of us who favor BSL because, well, our
dogs were attacked, maimed and killed by dogs designed to do just
that. There are more and more of us “fan boys and girls” of dogsbite.
org, as you call us, who happen upon dogsbite every day, because we
had one of those special blood letting events. Once upon a time, we
knew and cared little about your dogfighting dogs, but now, well, we
have been “educated” by the dogs themselves. If you have never
watched one of these dogs doing exactly what they were created to do,
you don’t know them. Believe me, it means more when it’s a being you love
that ends up in the maws of a sweet pibble. You choose to own and advocate dogs that have been purposely bred to be “dog aggressive”, that sounds more “anti-dog”.
Sometimes, oops, they attack herds of goats, horses, bikes and cars,
and people, some of the people are pit bull advocates like you.
How do you like the status quo? More of the same?
Do your education, and your advocacy. We value the freedom of speech. The more you do, it seems, the more of we “fan boys and girls” there will be. Does it upset you that we
are becoming vocal and organized? Are we just to be silent about what
happened to us, don’t you think it’s rather a natural course that we
should reach out to one another? It should please you greatly that
very few of us ever receive any justice, that besides living
loss of a family member (sometimes a dog, sometimes a child), a cheek,
a former life, we lose assets, and live with the perpetual bloody movie
playing in our memory.
What’s really great, is when county and cities are sued by victims, tax
payers will be paying for the mess created by all of your “good intentions”.
Oh, everybody is, has been doing that for quite sometime now,
all of the extra police, the lion’s share of the animal control budget,
the emergency team and the life flight helicopters, the haz-mat clean up.. It didn’t
work out so great for the family of Klonda Richey, but perhaps it will
for Mr. Devitt.
Julie Edwards-Matanga: Any time you’d want to talk about these issues, you just let me know. We’ll link up your webcam. Then we can conversate face to face/voice to voice in an environment that doesn’t just allow you to type delusional stuff that’s so heavy on misrepresentation.
don’t waste your time even trying to talk to them your wasting your time, no amount of proof or logic will sink in they’ve convinced themselves they’re right, delusional and dangerous, advocating poisoning, stabbing and generally killing pets any way you can and all under the premise of allegadly being a victim advocacy, the fact that they se and abuse victims it’s safe to say they’re more about killing pitbulls then community safety and they quickly turn to slander,defammation and threats as soon as they realize that you have actual facts, proof and/or evidence as they use media reports and merritless’s ramblings as proff, they obviously have no real grasp on the concept of proof and evidence as opposed to opinions?