I’ve re-read my article plenty of times. Maybe I missed something. I thought that, due to the backlash that I’m currently getting, maybe I was honestly unfair or harsh. I’ve gotta say, upon reading it back numerous times, I feel more strongly than ever that I wrote the appropriate article and that I did what made sense to me. It continues to make sense to me. When addressing Villalobos directly, which was only a small portion of the article, what I wrote was not harsh. If anything, I went out of my way to praise them, while laying out what the published dynamics of this legislation aims to do, and then asking them to reconsider their support for it. That’s basically it. The “harsh” sections were reserved for Councilman Glenn Green and the legislation itself. Those stating otherwise must not have read it, because it’s still online and you can see it for yourself.
Literally no one is disputing anything specific about what I wrote. I’ve been dealing with this for a solid 6-8 hours now, since waking up, and no one is attempting to point out irregularities or inaccuracies. The vast majority of those disagreeing with what I wrote are basically attacking me as a person, calling me names, cursing at me, comparing our “popularity,” and so on and so forth. Can I get some kind of a thoughtful discourse? The lack of that is usually proof enough that I made a valid point.
^Do you not see this? They keep saying that that doesn’t mean that they support everything that’s in the bill. Okay, fine. But it’s in the proposed bill. So if the bill passes, it happens. They support the bill. They are supporting what Councilman Green is proposing. Yet, I’m called the “liar” for simply pointing this out and then trying to break down what’s being proposed, and then asking Villalobos to reconsider their support for it. It’s being said by many that that apparently amounts to an “attack” on Villalobos. Not at all.
So I’m simply going to state a few things that I’ve also stated on my Facebook page…
This backlash that I’m getting for my statement on Villalobos’ position on the BSL in Westwego thing, as if I’m “jealous” or “uninformed” or “not reading,” or “not understanding,” or being a “hypocrite,” is totally off the charts insane. It’s really sad that some people can actually read something that was pretty darn clear, and still come to the vapid opinion that I’m somehow throwing rocks at the throne. It’s really sad that some people can read something that was fully sourced and essentially a response to information that is OUT IN THE OPEN, and then try to imply that I’m basically an “uninformed hater” that knows nothing about nothing. Where is the disconnect?
A hater? Of Tia and Villalobos? How?? I respect the hell out of both. I’m a hater for pointing out the obvious? I’m a hater for noticing that they are supporting some egregious compromise on BSL, and then trying to tell their hundreds of thousands of fans that this legislation actually is not BSL and that I’m somehow lying or misrepresenting their position? How? Why? For what? Wow. Humanity never ceases to let you down.
What’s most stunning is how so many people are just piling on me for reasons that don’t even make sense, as if they didn’t read a single word of what I wrote, and then calling me the hypocrite for “not reading.” A lot of this type of stuff seems to be coming from people who would rather follow someone because of “who” they are, instead of respond back to what I wrote with any kind of substance at all. What didn’t I read? How is what is being proposed in Westwego and supported by Villalobos not BSL? Can someone explain this to me? Can someone retort anything that I said, instead of just attacking the messenger? Someone even went so far as to actually compare me to Colleen Lynn!! You actually have to laugh at this stuff to keep from crying.
This world seems to be more and more awash in celebrity worship and so many people actually live their lives as if that kind of stuff somehow trumps any and everything. I love what Tia does, but she isn’t above criticism and neither am I. Criticize away at me, but please base it in something. I went out of my way to write the most thorough piece that I could, and to make it clear that I love what VRC does, but to also lay out my case for why I think that what they’ve chosen to do in Westwego is extremely damaging. I explained why, and thoroughly. I then simply asked them to reconsider their stance. That’s it. It wasn’t an “attack,” it wasn’t me “slamming” Tia, as so many people are now saying. My goodness. I’m in no way “jealous” of her fame, rather the opposite, and extremely happy that she has the platform that she has in order to show the true and wonderful nature of these dogs. I think that’s like the 50th time that I’ve said this now! Yet so many people are trying to boil the genuine stuff that I said down to “he’s just hating.” Really? I mean, really?
You can kill me all you want. Whomever wants to say whatever, go for it. I just wish that it was actually based in something, or in an effort to substantially retort something that I said. Instead, it seems to be the opposite. I’m just “bad” because I dared make a statement against a position that is clearly discriminatory and clearly meant to demonize Pit Bulls as a whole. I’m not saying that that’s what Tia wants, I’m saying that by her supporting the legislation that’s what she plays a role in basically allowing to have happen. It’s not my fault that Villalobos is supporting Councilman Green’s legislation, and backing a “compromise” that is totally wrongheaded and tyrannical on numerous levels. Yet, so many people have completely lost sight of that, simply based out of who this person is. It’s Tia, so we can’t dare question it. Um, why? Things shouldn’t work like that, where substance and principles go flying out the window, context out the window. Your dogs are going to be the ones affected! I’m all about compromise, and working together with people in all facets of my life. But I’m not up for “compromising” when it comes to people (like Green) who are hellbent on scapegoating Pit Bulls, demonizing them, perpetuating stereotypes, flaunting open discrimination and then passing unjust laws that usher all of that stuff in. I’m not for compromising with that.
In closing… What’s being lost here, and what’s most discouraging to me personally, is the clear disconnect between what is truly BSL and what many people actually do consider BSL vs. what they do not consider BSL. It’s beyond depressing that this definition is actually being fractured and that thousands of people don’t even seem to understand the basic nature of the legislation. For that, Tia should be ashamed. Because she is currently perpetuating that, and now doubling down on it by coming after me and attempting to turn my comments into something that they were not. Too many people will just listen to her, and take it as scripture, instead of even attempting to understand what is being discussed. That’s sad.
Thanks to those that actually know the difference.
Villalobos then came out with a statement, and then a 2nd statement, which was especially dramatic and pretty much out of bounds.
In the 1st one they tell me to “read before I write” and that I’m “spreading rumors,” while doubling down on this fearmongerish line of thought that had they not “compromised” then there would have been a total ban. That’s untrue, but okay. Telling me that I should read before I write is degrading and disingenuous. You bet I read before I wrote, why wouldn’t I have? This kind of a dismissive response is insulting everyone’s intelligence, their own supporters included, by taking petty shots at me while they ignore the actual statements and positions that their own organization made and took in regards to the legislation that is being discussed here.
The 2nd statement was far more over the top, where they imply that I’ve somehow ruined the day for their adorable Puma, who was just adopted. This ignores the fact that Villalobos’ own post was what linked these 2 events together, by posting a picture of Puma and then ranting about me for 5 paragraphs. That was their choice. They took the focus off of Puma, not me. They then accuse me of actually wanting them shut down, blame me for their donations drying up and then attempt to blame me for losing future adopters. If that wasn’t enough, they then claim that due to my blog post they “will no longer be commenting, discussing, talking, posting about BSL.” So it’s now become MY FAULT for their failure to use their massive platform to positively counter BSL around the country. Then comes the accusations of me wanting attention at their expense, and that I was getting my “15 seconds of fame.” Nice. They even source an article that they recently re-posted of mine from 2 years ago, calling it “one of the best reads ever” in regards to BSL and California. Less than a week later my rather consistent opposition to BSL is no longer legitimate for that praise…
Regarding this notion that I’m “wanting them shut down.” This is a totally absurdist statement. Just for the record: I HAVE NO DESIRE TO SEE VILLALOBOS SHUT DOWN, NOR DID I MAKE MY STATEMENTS IN AN EFFORT TO CAUSE THEM TO “LOSE SUPPORT.” My statements were made because I am against breed-discriminatory legislation. That’s it. Read what I wrote. It’s totally out there and available for people to read. Not only what I wrote, but what they wrote, and what Councilman Green is pushing for. For the 958th time: I SUPPORT VILLALOBOS and resent these accusations that I want them shut down, or that I’m trying to garner “fame” off of their reputation. Anyone that knows me knows that I don’t give a rat’s ass about fame. I don’t do what I do for “fame.” It’s total and utter bologna. If 5,000 people want to unlike my page in mass, that’s okay. People can be as nasty as they want to be with me, call me names, tell me all kinds of things that I can’t exactly repeat here… But it sucks that Villalobos are actually using reverse psychology and will probably succeed in turning massive amounts of people against me, people that don’t even know or care to even read what I actually wrote. Ultimately, people can make up their own minds on my reputation and my motivations. What I wrote is out there, I stand by it. I’m against BSL, not Tia, not Villalobos. I’m against “compromising” with people who are hellbent on scapegoating Pit Bulls for the individual incidents that irresponsible people repeatedly cause. This Council would never succeed in achieving a ban. We (Pit Bull people, Villalobos, myself, you) are in the right. BSL is totally backwards and wrong, and giving in at any ratio is extremely harmful. But again, saying that I want to see VRC shut down is an absolute falsehood. That’s the last thing that I’d ever want. They also can’t have it both ways, calling me a “nobody” that is “piggybacking on your fame,” while at the same time blaming me for “tons of donations lost” and the potential “closure” of your hugely massive and amazing rescue. If I’m a “nobody” then how in the world would I even remotely be able to accomplish that? Again, I have no desire in the world to see Villalobos close, or have their donations dry up. People can continue to put words in my mouth but I’ve been beyond clear and pretty darn consistent in the face of all of this.
Here’s my responses to basically the only criticisms that I’ve received, and they are constant and almost always the same:
That I should “go away” or “shut up,” coming from random people…
Folks, I’m here as a PIT BULL ADVOCATE that is stringently anti-BSL, in all forms. This is my page. I also run a website. I’m an American, which means the Constitution applies to me. You can’t tell me to “be gone” from my own page. I’m allowed to have my own opinion, I’m allowed to critically think, I’m allowed to discuss Pit Bull-related issues. Clearly I’ve made valid points, or this wouldn’t even be an issue. How do you think this has become an issue, on any level, if I didn’t make valid points? If you think rock-solid people from the Pit Bull community don’t stand behind what I wrote, which was much more anti-BSL and didn’t even address VRC until the end, then you’re sadly mistaken.
That I’m “seeking attention,” or “fame” by saying what I’m saying, coming from random people and also from Villalobos…
That Villalobos has done “way more than me,” and “more than I’ll ever be able to do,” coming from random people…
I’ve kind of already addressed this one numerous times above, but someone actually said to me that I’m saying all of this “to get a few readers.” Uh, not quite. My page has received around 100 likes since they shared my 2-year-old article this past week. I’ve actually earned my support, thanks. Same as them. Further, for every person that chooses to no longer support me, there’s likely 2 or 3 that have now chosen to support me. That goes for taking on any position of difficulty. Some people actually don’t like puff pieces. Also, like I said above, it doesn’t matter to me if I lose thousands of followers over my blog post regarding Villalobos. That isn’t what this is about. This is about BSL, not me, or Tia or Villalobos. I absolutely do not care, AT ALL, about having “followers.” The entire premise of that phrase is derogatory. I’d much rather have 1,000 critical thinking, compassionate and rational supporters than have 500,000 people that don’t even understand me or get where I’m coming from. This isn’t a popularity contest, or a dick-measuring contest, despite all of these people constantly throwing that vapid and empty stuff in my face. I do not care about your perception of fame. I care about opposing breed-discriminatory legislation in all of its forms. I support Villalobos, just not their position on this issue. Read what I wrote.
That I should stop “spreading lies,” because Tia is all of a sudden “wanting to make this breed-neutral,” coming from random people…
Councilman Green’s legislation is NOT breed-neutral. This is a total misrepresentation of the current truth. Villalobos stated quite clearly that “we are actually in support of what Councilman Green is proposing.” Those are her words, not mine. So whether it eventually becomes breed-neutral, and whether Villalobos eventually supports all of these discussed things for all dogs in Westwego, that doesn’t change the fact that they first supported his initial proposal that was and still is breed-specific. Stop rewriting history.
That these laws “won’t even be enforced anyways,” so it’s “not to worry about,” and that Tia is being “tactical,” coming from random people…
Did you get that? The implication that the eventually passed law will not be enforced, therefore it’s not a big deal and people are making a big deal out of nothing. So why the law in the first place then? That’s a pointless situation, a dog and pony show. If any of that is even remotely true then Villalobos’ stance should be that this law is pointless because it’s unenforceable and does nothing good besides villainize Pit Bulls and Pit Bull owners. Yet that’s not their stance.
That I need to “apologize,” and that I’m clearly in the wrong based around the “backlash” that I’ve gotten, coming from random people…
This isn’t about me, or them. I am not perfect, neither are they. Nobody is and nothing will ever be. But there will absolutely be no apology from me, as I did nothing wrong. I talked about the proposed legislation at length, and simply asked Villalobos to change their STATED position on it. Okay? And just because there’s a “backlash” doesn’t mean that that’s the majority of people. It just means that I’ve gotten backlash. Big deal. I don’t choose what to do based on how much backlash or how little backlash I’m going to get.
And that I’m “attacking” Villalobos/Tia, being “negative,” or “infighting,” coming from random people…
Since when has trying to have a genuine discourse become “attacking”? How is talking about the injustice of breed-discriminatory laws, and the hedging against those principles, a “negative” thing? And when did “infighting” all of a sudden become the go-to response for every single person that never wants to have a public opinion or give their own thoughts on anything?
For the absolute last time: I have no ill will towards Villalobos, or Tia Torres. I respect the hell out of what they do, and their rescue in general. I have no desire for them to be shut down (asinine). I have no desire to see their donations dry up. None. People should continue supporting Villalobos! But people should also be against BSL and BDL. If those things cross then people need to figure it out for themselves. I asked questions. I then asked Villalobos to reconsider their position on Green’s proposed legislation. That’s all. All of this misinformation is out of control. Everything I’ve written is publicly available. In closing, I’m most definitely not the type to cower to intimidation from a lynch mob. If that’s what comes then I’ll just get more and more outspoken about it. I support Villalobos and continue hoping that they will eventually oppose Councilman Green’s pathetic demonization efforts.
To be 100% blunt and honest with you: This is a long-winded response to basically say that you stand by your article and stance, but have respect for what Villalobos does.
All you had to say–if anything–was that you still don’t consider your stance to be at fault but you wish no ill feelings on them.
That’s it. Yes, you are allowed to type what you wish because of free country etc.
But this long of a post on something that didn’t need to be?
Now, you said that you don’t see how your article was wrong in any way, shape or form. How about the title itself? The title is accusatory and will, of course, lure people to read it with judgement and possibly disgust prior before they even read the actual article. In my eyes, you didn’t know the “whole” story when you wrote the article (not literally part of their association), hence the backlash. If you hadn’t written the title as if they were already “condemned,” perhaps your article wouldn’t have been so ill received by many.
While I appreciate the fact that you linked to both your article and the two statements by Villalobos, I disagree with regard to the second statement. Yes, the statement was much longer and more emotional, but she took the time to explain *why* she was in support by meeting halfway etc. It is obvious that you don’t agree with that stance or support as a fellow Pit bull advocate; okay, that’s your right. But don’t make an article that with the title alone implies that they aren’t to be respected or trusted. You say you support them and don’t wish for them to be shut down, but yet your first article and this one suggest something else.
I don’t know you, I don’t know your site very well, this much is true. But this post appears to me too defensive and too hypocritical.
You posted your article, they posted two statements. Now you’ve done this. Just let it go.
You guys are so full of it. You should get the FULL story before blasting off on them.
You all go jump off a cliff and let others handle things since you CLEARLY like to cause the downfall of other organizations.
So screw you all, have a nice day. You’re /NEVER/ getting help from me! I support Villalobos. NOT you *******.
I find it ironic that you are upset that people are calling you names and saying rude things because they read and only chose to read the post made by Villalobos. Especially when in reality you did the same thing to them. All of the people who read your article and only yours are the ones who started saying nasty things and canceling donations to Villalobos. In my opinion, you started it. You chose to highlight that they said they were “actually in support of what councilman Green is doing” but chose not to highlight the next few words saying that yes they would like some changes and additions to the rule. That doesn’t sounds like full support of what he is doing to me. So instead of privately going to Villalobos to get a better understanding of what they’re saying you immediately make it public writing an article and accusing them of supporting something everybody knows they don’t. If you’re going to call someone out, especially publicly, please get your facts straight and make an effort to get an actual stance on what the other’s opinions are. I don’t care about anyone’s fame, I care about the dogs. If you do too, please stop accusing other people that are trying to help of such harmful accusations. All your article did was take away from these poor creatures who need as much help as they can get.
You are right on. I was posting my comment, but figured I should read what’s here first. You posted verbatim what I typed. Thanks!!!
Bottom line is that you should have known that people do not take the time to read every word that is posted in a blog or on a facebook page and that everyone interprets words differently. You have done, and are continuing to do with this second post, everything the media does to our dogs by posting your opinion without having all of the facts before doing so. The responsible thing would have been to have a discussion with VRC to make sure you were not misinterpreting their words, as you claim VRC supporters are now doing to you.
The bottom line – you have hurt THE DOGS, both directly and indirectly.
No. The people who decided to pull their donations and make a stink based on words written by someone else are the ones who are going to hurt the dogs. Josh has a right to his opinion. I have a right to mine. I actually agree with Josh in this, that doesn’t mean I don’t continue to support Tia and VCR. I do. And I gave them a $500 donation just a bit over a month ago, so I’m not just playing armchair jockey here. If others decide, based on ONE article that they are no longer donationg, that’s the person to be mad at. Not the guy out here writing a blog and trying to inform people of HIS feelings.
Next time think long and hard before you type. If the legislation passes what do you think the pit bull owners would want yes they would rather it not pass but you can’t always get what you want but we can compromise and step away from a full breed ban. She isn’t supporting it she’s trying to change it so pit bull owner’s won’t have to get rid of beloved pets. In a perfect world we wouldn’t have these problems but our world isn’t perfect and people are dumb all we can do is make the best of it and stand up in what we believe in. Yes i would like to see this not pass but if it does im glad tia has stepped in to compromise so we don’t have a full on breed ban.
Sad thing is there are so-called advocates that believe a breed BAN is a better option than a compromise. They said “take the ban and then fight it from there.” How could anyone believe that is the right approach knowing litigation could take YEARS and in the meantime, dogs are being ripped away from their families the same way it happened in Denver.
Josh,
I have posted on two of you threads on your page and have re read everything here yet again. I still do not see that you were attacking them but questioning there position. I do however agree with those who say your title was unfair and drew some pre conclusion from those who trust & follow you.
I in no way mean to attack you. I have watched your rescue video’s, I read what you write. I think you are a very intelligent and dedicated man who strongly stands his ground in what he believes. That is something to be proud of and deserves support.
I do also however think that two organizations that do SO MUCH FOR THESE DOGS even if they do not always agree on the choices each makes should have handled this privately. Why ?? Because now it has become just another facebook sensationalized rescue infighting mess and its not even you or Tia who are fighting its the supports of each of you that is fighting. This does not help the pitbulls in anyway. It IS causing further separation between owners and advocates. This is not needed.
Everything has to start somewhere and we have all who love these dogs been speaking out & fighting against BSL for YEARS NOW and nothing is working in a manner that will stop thousands dying for their breed alone, some for just the look and no proof of breed. Our beloved dogs are still in trouble so no I do NOT think VRC is wrong for trying to Work toward a solution.
I also am looking at this from the stance that agreeing to compromise and offer idea’s on a proposal that is not yet set and they would have had a full month to further work out details should not have turned into this in anyway.
You are NOT wrong for following your convictions and standing by what you think is the right thing to do but in the same light neither are they.
What has been done here upsets me as a pitbull rescuer because I feel like your saying compromise is wrong that if, say BSL comes to my town and I agree to meet all requirements to save my dogs life is somehow saying I’m wrong because I did not stand against it and cost my dog its life.
As many have said this issue is in no way black/white many people are faced with this every day and we ALL have our own opinions and values. No one should be judged in the face of desperation when all the choices are BAD for picking the lessor of 2 evils and at least trying to work towards a better solution.
We can not just continue to say we are against BSL in our big loud voices while bully’s still die daily. Working toward something better in my opinion is way better than what we are all doing now. Not everyone can be you or Tia and have the venue you guys have for being heard and when 2 of our biggest allies are not able to agree that they are both doing the very best they can do for the dogs they rescue in their separate situations how in the hell will we ever unite the bully lovers of the world to do so.
I love you both, support you both and am hoping this dies down so I can continue to do so PROUDLY … Like it or not, ask for it or not the world is watching you both and as we already have said the world follows popularity and now at least in the world of dog rescue on facebook you are BOTH in the lime light.
The only other thing I have to say is that it is not fair for you to pick one sentence to highlight in a post and not include the whole post which further explained their position, thoughts & reasoning. I also however do not believe that anyone who TRULY does love these dogs will stop supporting Tia or you and I do not think this will all hurt VRC as much as they may be afraid it will. She did however if you missed it state that they have already had calls from people saying they would not donate due to your comments but lets face it right now their following is way larger than yours and they will overcome this and go on and so will you. I am just afraid of how many people will now be discouraged because of this whole issue and lets face it our dogs can not afford to lose even one loving supporter if anything we need more now more than ever.
I’m very curious as to what you have done to help the situation? Have you offered any options? Sitting behind a computer screen is not going to help anything. Do you for one minute think Tia has not thought about this before posting it. Lets for kicks say the insurance thing passes, Ok how many people do you know that are going to run out and get insurance and microchip their pets? NONE!! Now, do you think that city has the funds and manpower to go house to house and check on this, NO. Do you think the city will spend thousands on search warrants just to check this out, NO. Not to mention every city in the united states post city works pay in the newspaper every year. Now, a city is going to see thousands of dollars going to something so outrageous as to going door to door to check for peoples pets. Well, lets say any city would be in a uproar. So, Tia is doing the best option she can, she knows damn well that people aren’t going to do this and I’m sure she knows there is nothing the city can do about it either. Its simple, you tell people what they want to hear just to shut them up.
Lacy, how about you do a little research on what swaylove is and what he does day in and day out? Mmmmmmmmmmkay?
Oh and as for the rest of your diatribe? Do some research on BSL, they HAVE gone into homes and taken dogs. Denver did it big time. To automatically assume that they will pass laws and then not enforce them is beyond ridiculous. I can’t even express how utterly stupid even saying that is.
I’m sure she means what has he done to help re: this specific situation…lol mmmmmmmmkay? Lol
People see what they want to see and hear what they want to hear. It was a great article with a lot of facts. Kuddos for you to stand up for what you believe in. I’m wondering why so many of these responders are so emotional and if truth be known- you must have hit on something noone else has had the guts to day. Stay strong and keep doing what you do best- informing and loving the pit bulls. We need more people like you!
No matter how I feel about the Swaylove/VRC issue
at the moment I will say this I see it as
VERY odd & ignorant that someone would even comment
here (even if they are a DIE hard VRC supporter)
without having a clue what Swaylove does. I do not
agree with all this muck & have stated my views on
both sides BUT to come here & ask what Sway is doing
or has done … REALLY ????
Please at least next time you want to go at someone
at least go take a half a$$ed glace at who your
questioning!!
There is more than insurance and chipping in this issue. There is mandatory spay/neuter, strict confinement requirements inside and outside the house, age limits on ownership, muzzling, leash specifications, any dog not registered with special registration is BANNED from the city, there are all kinds of things included in Councilman Greens proposal, all breed specific. In fact I don’t think there is anything that is breed neutral in there.
Never mind that insurance companies drop restricted breeds from their coverage when BSL is enacted, who is going to have the THOUSANDS of dollars that is required in 30 days to come into compliance with these laws? Confinement requirements cost money and a lot of it.
Ever hear the phrase can’t see the forest for the trees?
This is a ban with nice feel good label of restriction slapped on it.
Lots of places have faced bans. We fight and we win. Though a ban was not imminent in Westwego. Both the Mayor and other city council members have said out right that they did not want a ban, that they couldn’t see how they could regulate what people do in their own home (ironic considering that that is part of the proposal)
Councilman Green has stated that he will give money from his discretionary fund to have this “strictly enforced” so your theory of they aren’t going to bother to enforce it is misguided at best, at worst a sad attempt at trying to justify rolling over and placidly accepting a proposal that will kill peoples family members.
Tia herself admitted that she has never done BSL advocacy in all her years of rescue. She does not know what she is doing in the political arena.
Telling people what they want to hear just to shut them up??? Like drinking blue kool aid? No thanks- ill stick w/the minority and stand and say what i believe in. Its so sad this villa…somebody took this so out of context. What is up w/that? They certainly dont appreciate another persons opinion-esp if its different. Sorry i will never be a following sheep…i respect someone to do whats right even if everyone is against you. Its called character…Sway/love has alot of character.
Just did a little thing called research. An guess what? Einhorn insurance DOES insure pit bulls
http://einhorninsurance.com/dangerous-dog-liability-insurance/
Amazing what i found in a min of my time!
Einhorn only insures in California.
Perhaps you should have taken five minutes instead of one and read their information.
Never said other wise did i?
Just pointing out he was partly wrong.
Simple as that.
I LOVE MY “PITS, HEART AND SOUL, AS MUCH AS I LOVE MY KIDS!! I WOULGLADLY, IN AN INSTANT, WITHOUT ANY HESITATNWHATSOEVER, LAY DOWN MY LFE FOR ANY OF MINE!! I HAVE 3 MALES….JASPER IS 21 YRS OLD (1/20/1992), HIS SONS IS SNOOPY IS 7YRS OLD(6/12/2008) AND THE BABY OF THE GROUP IS SUNSHINE HE’S ALMOST 2 YRS OLD (9/28/2011). THEY SLEEP IN BED WITH ME EVERY NITE. I LIVE IN A NOT SO GREAT AREA OF TOWN AND THEY PROVIDE ROUND THE CLOCK SECURITY, AND ONLY ASK FOR MY LOVE IN RETURN. WOULDN’T TAKE. A MILLION DOLLARS CASH FOR EM!! THEY STOOD BESIDE ME WHEN NOBODY ELSE DID AND I WON’T EVER FORGET THAT!
awesome.. it brings so much warmth to see such love for one’s pets and makes me feel truly happy.. wish you joyous times with your sweet pets..
you have told the truth from your heart with total honesty.. your love for the pit-bulls shines out through every word.. and your concern for their welfare and their happy future.. please go on with your invaluable service to the voiceless ones..
bless all those who care for the suffering of the helpless and the innocent beings..
Never said other wise did I? Just pointing out he was partly wrong. Simple as that.
While Tia did say they support Councilman Green’s proposal, you fail to acknowledge the comments posted below which admittedly Tia should have included in the main post and most of this bickering could have been avoided.
“Tammi Mcquown: so if they are doing this for pits it should be for every dog out there not just one breed that messed up.
Like · Reply · 115 · May 13 at 11:06am
Hide 29 Replies
Villalobos Rescue Center Agreed and that’s one of the things I’m going to propose
Like · 51 · May 13 at 11:14am”
[…] someone with the access to speak on behalf of Villalobos came out and stated that they were “in support of what Councilman Green is proposing.” Those are her (or the page’s words). Everyone continues ignoring the fact that that […]